Buddhism Without Meditation in the Age of Appearances
In an era of collapsing attention spans and spiritual branding, it has become common to hear people claim the title of “Buddhist” while disavowing or bypassing the core practices of the Dharma. Meditation is often seen as optional. Dharma quotes adorn social media posts alongside self-help slogans. “Mindfulness” is marketed like a weight-loss product. But can someone truly be called a Buddhist if they do not meditate? Is compassion alone enough?
The Threshold: What Makes Someone a Buddhist?
In traditional Buddhism, one becomes a Buddhist by taking refuge in the Three Jewels: the Buddha (teacher), the Dharma (teaching), and the Sangha (spiritual community). This act is a conscious turning of one’s life toward liberation. In this view, practice may begin small, and perfection is not the measure — sincerity is.
So yes, a person who has taken refuge, who aspires to walk the Path and live ethically — even without formal meditation — can be considered a Buddhist. Many householders in Asia through centuries have embodied the Dharma through right livelihood, generosity, and moral discipline without extensive meditative training. The Buddha himself taught that ethics (śīla), concentration (samādhi), and wisdom (prajñā) form the path, and even partial entry into that triad is meaningful.
But What of Meditation?
Meditation, in Buddhism, is not a hobby or wellness regimen. It is the crucible where the illusion of self is softened, examined, and ultimately undone. Without this inward turning — through zazen, vipassanā, mantra recitation, or yogic visualization — the deeper functions of Buddhism remain dormant.
Buddhism is not meditation, but Buddhism is not Buddhism without meditative awareness.
One may live ethically, be kind, and speak gently — and this is good. But these are the fruit, not the root, of awakening. Without digging into the roots of delusion — through direct, internal seeing — the spiritual path risks becoming a moral identity rather than a liberating force.
The Compassion Question
Some argue that compassion is enough — and in a sense, this is true. The Buddha did not ask for uniform practice, but he demanded intention and direction. If one truly lives with compassion — not sentimentally but courageously — that person is a light in this world.
But authentic compassion in Buddhism is not merely kindness. It is the application of wisdom to the suffering of others. It requires insight. And insight, in the Buddhist view, is not inherited or adopted — it is cultivated.
Eventually, true compassion leads inward. It meets its own limits, its own unconscious biases. It confronts pride, burnout, and despair. It calls for inner stillness, self-emptiness, and clarity. In short, it calls for meditation — in some form.
The Age of Appearances
We live in what the Buddhists call Akuse (悪世) (Japanese) — a degenerate age, full of defiled perceptions, corrupted views, and eroded practice. In such times, the Dharma is often reduced to symbols and slogans. People borrow the language of awakening but resist the transformation.
Claiming Buddhism without practice — especially without even minimal self-reflection — is like calling oneself a musician because one likes the sound of violins. Beautiful sentiments are not enough. Buddhism is not a lifestyle. It is a path through illusion, not an aesthetic to embrace.
From a Vajrayāna, Hongaku Mikkyō Jodo, and the himitsu nenbutsu perspective, the inner vow, the heart-commitment to awaken, is what makes a Buddhist. Whether one meditates or not, if one offers themselves to truth, recognizes the illusory nature of ego and clings less to it, and works for others’ liberation as much as their own they are walking the Path — even if it looks unconventional. But if someone only claims the identity of Buddhist, with no practice, no internal shift, and no aspiration — then they are only culturally adjacent to Buddhism, not inside it.
A Middle Way
That said, we should not create a new fundamentalism: “Only those who meditate daily are true Buddhists.” The Dharma accommodates the broken, the beginning, the doubting, and the distracted. It always has.
But there is a difference between walking slowly and never walking at all.
There is a difference between saying, “I am not ready to meditate yet” and “Meditation doesn’t matter.”
There is a difference between aspiring to compassion and using it to justify spiritual inertia.
The question is not whether someone deserves the title “Buddhist.” The real question is: Is your heart facing liberation or avoidance? Are you moving toward truth, however slowly, however imperfectly? If so, you are on the path but remember:
Sooner or later, compassion will lead you to silence.
Silence will reveal the self.
And the self, when truly seen, will dissolve.
That is Buddhism.
We speak of taking Refuge in the Triple Jewel but still fear, hate, lust, etc. Instead of taking refuge in the Dharma, for example, we take refuge in fear an the craving for security, hate and the craving that others conform to our vision of they ought to be and intolerance, and desire with its illusion of satisfaction.
Yes — this is a deeply honest observation, and it cuts straight to the subtle inner conflict at the heart of most spiritual lives: we say we take refuge in the Triple Jewel, yet we continually take refuge in the very poisons that bind us.
This tension is not failure — it is the arena of practice.
.jpg)
