How To Create a Better Delusion
If the ways
of the mind were simple, its problems would be simple too and therefore easy to
fathom. In showing how to end its problems, the Buddha might have opted for
simple and short instructions. He probably would have given us a single,
all-encompassing approach to whatever happens to us in the present — like what
we find today in the spiritual marketplace of New Age Buddhism. We would have
received from the Buddha, instead of modern gurus, a Noble Single-fold Path. It
might have read, “just mindfulness,” “just concentration,” “just non-reactive
awareness,” “just choiceless awareness,” or “just meditation — whatever that
means in our Western enlightenment market — or even “just emptiness,” another
word with a myriad of meanings depending on the teacher. Like many current
self-proclaimed voices of the Buddha, he might not have bothered to teach much
at all, knowing that people could easily solve their problems on their own and
give credit for it. "Trust your innate nature, your innate understanding,
your original enlightenment," and left us on our own. This is not,
however, how the mind works, and that's not how he taught. It’s what is taught
by contemporary teachers teach and how it is taught today.
Even just a
few minutes spent observing the ways of the mind can show how complex and
serpentine those ways are. This naturally means that the mind’s problems are
complex and tangled as well, especially the problem of suffering. The Buddha
told us that the causes of suffering are knotted and tangled like a bird's
nest, like the thread in a tangled skein.
[A Certain Deity asked the Buddha]The inner tangle and the outer tangle—This generation is entangled in a tangle.And so I ask of Gotama this question:Who succeeds in disentangling this tangle?”
[The Buddha]“When a wise man, established well in virtue,Develops consciousness and understanding,Then as a bhikkhu ardent and sagaciousHe succeeds in disentangling this tangle.”
— Samyutta
Nikaya 1.13 & quoted in the Visuddhimagga Chapter 1 §1
Tangle is another
word for the network of craving. For that is a tangle in the sense of lacing
together, like the tangle called network of branches in a thicket, because it
goes on arising up and down1 among the objects of consciousness beginning with
what is visible.
It’s called
the inner tangle and the outer tangle because it arises as craving for one’s
own needs as well as those of others, for one’s own person and that of another
and for the internal and external bases for consciousness. The tangle grows
becoming both personal and social. This generation is truly entangled in a
tangle. Like a briar patch is entangled by the briar tangle. This “generation”
refers to all living beings. Every sentient being is entangled by the tangle of
craving, intertwined, interlaced by it. What is asked is, who is capable of
disentangling it? The answer is — a “wise” person.
When
solving any complicated problem the solution lies in how the problem is framed.
Identifying the problem means we have to examine the patterns of the factors
with that problem. It’s a matter of doing what needs to be done when it needs
to be done. Once the pattern is discerned you can decide which factors are
crucial to the solution and which factors we can ignore.
Framing the
issue correctly allows us to determine how to approach each of the individual
parts of the problem so that instead of exacerbating the problem, the factors
actually aid with the problem’s solution. When faced with a problem it is
helpful to know which questions are useful and which questions create new
dimensions to the problem.
The Buddha
a great deal of importance to the skill of framing the issue of suffering in
the most skillful way. He called this ability yoniso manasikara —
appropriate attention. He taught that no other inner quality was more helpful
for untangling suffering and gaining release from that suffering (Itivuttaka 16).
In giving his most detailed explanation of appropriate attention (Majjhima
Nikaya 2), Among the examples of inappropriate attention, which center on
questions of identity and existence: "Do I exist?" "Do I
not?" "What am I?" "Did I exist in the past?"
"Will I exist in the future?" What makes these questions are
inappropriate because they lead to "a wilderness of views, a thicket of
views" such as "I have a self," or "I have no self,"
all of which lead to entanglement, and none to the end of suffering.
Right
mindfulness helps to remember to formulate and sustain a stable framework for
being aware of the activity of the mind’s own fabrication. It also “remembers”
lessons drawn from right view, lessons from reading and listening to the
Dhamma. Lessons drawn from examining the results of our own actions can be used
to artfully form our activity in a more skillful way. This can act as the path
to the end of suffering, which is also a form of fabrication. This is one way
to create a better, more skillful delusion. Right mindfulness doesn’t only
witness our fabrications it takes and active interest in it. Motivated by Right
View it promotes the cessation of suffering. Still, it is a fabrication, one
that helps to manage the intentional dynamics of the processes of fabrication,
conforming them to the path of the fourth noble truth.
In Pure
Land Buddhism it is recognized that all of our experiences are simply
delusions. Through mindfulness we can create better delusions, more skillful
fabrications that can help toward a happier and freer life, but also help us
along the Path.
Right
mindfulness interacts with all of the factors in dependent co-arising, and in
particular with those that come just before sensory contact. These preliminary
factors are: ignorance, fabrication, consciousness, name-and-form, and the six
sense media. Samyutta Nikaya 12:2 explain them in reverse order.
“And which contact? These six contacts: eye contact, ear-contact, nose-contact, and tongue-contact, body-contact, intellect-contact. This is called contact.
“And which six sense media? These six sense media: the eye-medium, the ear-medium, the nose-medium, the tongue-medium, the body-medium, the intellect-medium. These are called the six sense media.
“And which name-&-form? Feeling, perception, intention, contact, & attention: This is called name. The four great elements and the form dependent on the four great elements: This is called form. This name & this form are called name-&-form.
“And which consciousness? These six consciousnesses: eye-consciousness, ear-consciousness, nose-consciousness, tongue-consciousness, body-consciousness, intellect-consciousness. This is called consciousness.
“And which fabrications? These three fabrications: bodily fabrications, verbal fabrications, mental fabrications. These are called fabrications.
“And which ignorance? Not knowing in terms of stress, not knowing in terms of the origination of stress, not knowing in terms of the cessation of stress, not knowing in terms of the way of practice leading to the cessation of stress: This is called ignorance.”
— Samyutta
Nikaya 12:2
Not only is
it important to be aware of fabrication but we also ought to consider the role
played by consciousness and attention (under name-and-form, nama—rupa)
in the causal progression — the components of sensory experience with which
right mindfulness most closely interacts.
This
interaction is a complex interaction of mental activity. Right mindfulness
depends on right view to know the exact the causal sequence of this process,
the right effort must be employed to deal with them in time. Right mindfulness
also has to keep in mind the fact that fabrication underlies and shapes them.
This is how it can focus right effort on the most effective strategies
manipulate fabrication to turn unskillful instances of attention and
consciousness into more skillful ones — more skillful fabrications,
constructions, manipulations of experience.
We aren’t
done yet. Right mindfulness has to apply skillful instances of attention and
consciousness in fabricating the path to the cessation of suffering. Given the
non-linear pattern of dependent co-arising, skillfully fabricated consciousness
and appropriate attention right mindfulness can turn and shape the very
conditions that underlie the fabrications, and this is why they can help in
fabricating the path.
These are
the classic lessons that right mindfulness draws from right view, in the form
of dependent co-arising, about consciousness and attention.
The problem
is modern meditators are prone to identify mindfulness with bare awareness
(aka, bare attention). What dependent co-arising has to say concerning the
nature of attention and consciousness (also often confused with bare awareness)
and their relationship to right mindfulness?
First
neither of them is bare. The untrained mind is conditioned by intentional
activity, through fabrication and intention in name-and-form. By the time they
come into contact with sensory data, ignorance has already preconditioned them
to receive and attend to those quanta of data in a unique and particular way
giving each of us a unique perspective on life and our experience of it.
Even in the
mind on the path they are still preconditioned. It is the function of knowledge
of right view to condition consciousness and attention in another direction —
the end of suffering. Ignorance is totally eradicated at the culmination of the
Path but not while we are on the Path. It is then that there is an experience
of unconditioned awareness, or as Je Tsongkhapa called it, “The direct
perception of emptiness.” Until then consciousness and attention are as a
matter of course aimed at happiness. The American ideal of the pursuit of
happiness manifests unskillfully in the untrained mind but with increasing skill
in the mind firmly on the path.
Neither
attention nor consciousness is identical with mindfulness. Consciousness is
simply the act of receiving and registering phenomena; attention is the act of
choosing which phenomena to focus on. They play an important role in
establishing mindfulness, because they are both related to the activity of
remaining focused. Attention is the skill used to stay solidly focused on the
most important events identifies through the consciousness in the present
moment.
Consciousness
is only suggested this connection, as consciousness is not explicitly mentioned
by name in the classical satipatthāna formula. Clearly the formula would is
ineffectual without consciousness. The relationship is made more precise in the
case of attention. Majjhima Nikaya 118 shows how the sixteen steps of breath
meditation fulfill the practice of satipatthāna. Here the Sutta speaks in words
that associate it with the skill of remaining focused and alert. While it
specifically refers to paying close attention to the breath, but the principle
is true of any other object of meditation, a kasina or chanting the name of
Amitabha, for example.
When
mindfulness evolves into right mindfulness the relationship between mindfulness
and attention grows even more obvious. Then attention becomes appropriate
attention. As mindfulness and attention are trained to act skillfully for the
end of suffering, they both become forms of anupassanā — or remaining focused
on something. Appropriate attention is a form of the act of remaining focused
on mental qualities (dhammānupassanā) as directed by the guidelines of the four
noble truths. Its purpose is to appropriately do what needs to be done
according to the four noble truths.
Although
mindfulness is not synonymous with bare attention, appropriate attention serves
as an aspect of right mindfulness, as a deliberate process guided by the scheme
of right view. Accordingly, right mindfulness plays a role in training
attention to be appropriate. Both consciousness and attention are shaped by
fabrication, which is shaped either by ignorance or knowledge. Right
mindfulness manages the task of using this knowledge to provide deliberate
fabricated consciousness and attention with a skillful intention.
Visit the Hongaku Jodo Website
Hongaku
Jodo supports itself through donations and the sales of some very cool stuff.
To check out the stuff click here.