On Being Right and On Being Wrong
Hell was once defined as a place where there is a Starbuck’s
on every corner. I guess I live in
a sort of a purgatory. While there’s not a Starbuck’s on every corner, they are
about a half-mile apart. Sometimes
stop at a Starbuck’s for a cup of coffee. If I get there before 10 am I get to
hear the local North Shore Tea Party people hold their daily meeting. They hang
out on the couches in front of the fireplace after they ask anyone who has
previously sat in their meeting place to leave. They are very important people
these wealthy North Shore Tea Party types.
They sit comfortably speaking at great length about the
problems of the world and how to solve them. The first thing they need to do is
impeach President Obama, then repeal the Affordable Care Act, stop anyone with
a “liberal” bent to not vote, and then pass anti-abortion laws and bring back
the death penalty for misdemeanors.
They say these things at the top of their lungs, causing their hardened
arteries to pop out at their collective forehead, and defy anyone to disagree
with them. They seem to want to argue; argue about politics, religion, the
economy and whatever passes for a controversial topic. They even want to argue
with Obama – and he’s not even there.
Ever notice how many people argue? They seem to argue about
everything. Mainly what they are arguing about is who is right? Everybody seems
to be right, at least in his or her own mind. When you argue with your loved
ones, friends and coworkers there is always the question of “who is right”. In
a Dharma Center or a monastery the answer to that question is simple; it’s the
abbot. The abbot is always right. Even when he is wrong he is still right. This
is the first monastic rule. The
Sangha are not democracies.
In Asia there is a very famous true story. Once there were
two monks arguing. The Abbot was perplexed wondering who was right and who was
wrong. There was a visiting monk staying at the monastery and the Abbot asked
his opinion as to the solution to the problem. After hearing the story the
visitor, cutting to the chase, said, “Oh this is simple. If you have two monks
arguing then they are both wrong. Dismiss them both.” And the Abbot did.
That’s the point of this teaching – if you are arguing it
doesn’t matter if you are factually correct or not because you both are already
wrong.
Arguing is in and of its self is wrong. One of the great
teachings of the Buddha is if it’s really truth, Dhamma, then it leads to peace
and freedom. If it leads to contention then it is not my teaching. If it leads
to lack of peace and lack of freedom then it is not Buddhism. That’s not truth.
What a wonderful description of the spiritual path we call
Buddhism. A spiritual path should be something that leads to peace and to
freedom. One of the reasons Buddhism does that is because it gets to the heart
of spirituality, what the life is all about. Instead of relying on something
like a book it relies on the truth of human experience. We do have books in
Buddhism, something like 6,000 volumes, but they are only guidelines. They are
expressions of what Buddha discovered about life. The truth does not rest in
books. Some books are truer than others, but if you claim that one book is the
absolute truth then you wind up beating people over the head with it. The
bigger the book the bigger the headache you give the other person. We don’t
need a book to find truth; we can recognize truth. Truth is peaceful and
harmonious.
If you can live in peace and harmony with others then you
can live in peace with yourself. That’s a sign of understanding what truth is.
It really doesn’t matter about what views you espouse while
sitting around the coffee table. Your opinion only has value to you. They
aren’t really even real. They have no standing within the framework of truth.
There’s nothing wrong with having a little debate, you know, arguing for
arguments sake. That may even be helpful in day-to-day problem solving. There
is really nothing wrong with that. The argument should never be stronger than
the friendship. In the end, though, if the argument does get heated, the one
who is right is the one who says “sorry” first. That person is the one who
knows what is important.
It doesn’t really matter who was factually correct. That was
in the past. Even a past that is 10 seconds ago is past, it’s gone and cannot
be retrieved. It’s only a memory and somewhat blurred already. What matters now
is what is important. What is
important is what leads to peace, that leads to freedom, and that leads to
harmony. The one who is right is the one who asks for forgiveness first. That
is an expression of love.
There is a
great story from the life of St. Francis. Franciscan monks are very similar to
Buddhist monks. They have no money and they beg for their food. One day a
Franciscan monk was going on his alms rounds and he met a poor man. He asked the man for food. The poor man
said, “I can’t give you anything. I’m starving. Do you have anything to give
me?”
The monk had nothing except his robe. So he took off his
robe and gave it to the poor man. “Go and sell this in the market place. Then
you can take the money and buy yourself some food.”
When the monk came back to the monastery he was naked. The
other monks only saw this crazy naked man outside the wall. They told him to go
away. They might have thrown in the equivalent to the modern “and get some
professional help.” Finally one of the other monks recognized him. They let him
in and asked why he was naked. They wondered if he was robbed. He told them
what had happed. The monks
exclaimed that this was indeed a noble thing that he did.
Unfortunately, word got around. The monk was marked as easy
pickings. So he came back to the monastery a few days later and he was naked
again. This happened three or four times. Finally he was called to the Abbot’s
office. The Abbot was quite upset. He very forcefully told the monk that he
could never give his robes away again. People donated those robes for the use
of the monks. “You can’t give these away. They are not your to give away. The
supply was not unlimited. People were making a fool of him and the monastery as
well.” The Abbot thought he should speak louder and more forcefully to make
sure the overly generous monk got the message.
All during the scolding the monk just hung his head and
listened. The Abbot finally dismissed the monk. The Abbot was sure that the
monk got the message and was very pleased with himself at how well he handled
the messaging. A few minutes later the monk returned with a bowl of soup.
“What’s this for?” the Abbot asked. The monk simply said, “You were talking so
much I was sure that your throat most be dry and that you are tired.”
This wasn’t said in sarcasm. It was said out of compassion.
The monk never thought about himself. He thought only about the welfare of
others. It didn’t matter who was right or who was wrong. All that mattered to
the monk was the comfort and welfare of somebody else.
I’m a human being. You’re a human being. We see things
differently but we can live together in peace and harmony. We live in harmony
when we live from the heart and not the head. We can ask for forgiveness even when we are really right and
the other person was really wrong. That isn’t easy, but it can be done.
We have this wonderful teaching in Buddhism called karma (kamma). The word karma
comes with a lot of Hindu baggage, kamma
not so much. If you are having problems with another person then you probably
had it coming. How can you live with a husband or wife or neighbor like that?
“Oh, it’s my karma.” He said with
a sigh. No matter what happens we can always blame our karma. Trouble is, that
isn’t what the Buddha taught. It’s just a way of teaching about karma in the
Buddhist community. The Buddha was sharper than most Buddhist teachers.
We really sometimes think that if my wife or neighbor abuses
me it’s my karma. Well, if that is true than I had better say I’m sorry no
matter what I am being scolded for. Then I am really being wrong if I am
arguing. But kamma, what the Buddha taught, has more to do with how I
habitually react to things like confrontation. If my kamma is to react with my
ego, be offended, angry, afraid, self-defensive, then yes, that is my kamma’s
fault. I am responding with my head and not my heart. I may as well be living
three feet away from my body because I am not present. I’m in my head. I want
to be right.
There is an interesting study. It comes out of the military,
Marines I think. A number of recruits were in training at an interrogation
school. They were each questioned for hours on a Tuesday. The questioning was grueling,
intimidating and often threatened violence. On Wednesday, the very next day,
the interrogators were lined up in a police line up situation. The recruits
were brought in one by one and asked who was it that interrogated them. Just 30
hours later their memories had failed. 70% could not recognize the person who
had abused them for hours just the day before. Who did what, who said what,
what did you do or say – none of these questions could be accurately answered,
even after an intense encounter.
How can we be sure of what happened yesterday? How can we
carry grudges? How can we say with any degree of accuracy that we were right
and they were wrong? These answers to these questions all rely on memory. We as
Buddhists are quite aware that memory is uncertain. The rest of the world is
not so sure about that.
No one can ever think they are wrong. Is it even possible to
think you are wrong? Even if you say you are wrong you are right. The best we
can say is that we were wrong. Yesterday I was wrong. Today I am right about
that.
One of the great things about the spiritual life is being
able to make mistakes. You don’t always have to be right. Sure, I make
mistakes. If we can learn to abandon our ego we can find a certain kind of
freedom. That is the freedom to be fallible.
Because of the tremendous power of ego many will never know
freedom. They have to be right and they cannot let go of that.
This is the psychology of how we make our views. We want to
be right so much that we actually bend reality to fit our thoughts. We see what
we want to see and we hear what we want to hear. How many times have you been
talking to a person and suddenly you realize that they haven’t been listening?
They really have been listening but only to the things they want to hear. It’s
like when I talk to my cats all they want to hear is “love” and “treats”. Like
us, they filter out the unimportant parts, the parts that don’t fit into their
model of the universe. We bend and filter our perceptions so that anything we
don’t want to hear does not come through into our consciousness. What we don’t
want to see we won’t see. What we don’t want to hear we won’t hear.
This is where the word dogma comes from. This is where our
religion and politics comes from. Like the Tea Party at Starbuck’s, if
experience does not fit our views we tune it out. It doesn’t exist for us. We
only want to know what we want to know. We form our views and opinions by
starting off with a certain worldview and form our perceptions around that view
filtering out everything else. If someone is a romantic optimist the world is
beautiful and people are beautiful. When I perform marriages the shiny eyes,
the wide smiles and the phrase “unconditional love” always strike me. For a
couple of hours the world is a beautiful place. Eventually reality and set in and each member of the happy
couple will want to be right again. They will discover that the phrase
“unconditional love” is an oxymoron.
Where do people go to fall in love? They don’t go to
Buddhist Centers. Monks are terribly unromantic. They might go to a
romantically candle lit café. They take long romantic walks in the moon light.
They go to bars. People usually go to dark places to fall in love. These places
usually serve alcohol. They tend to fall in love with people while in the dark
and inebriated. They fall in love with people they would never have fallen in
love with while sober in a well-lit room. But, having fallen in love they bend
reality to fit their view that they could not have been wrong about the other
person. People do it because it’s fantasy. They want to feel all warm and
snuggly and “in love.” They are
willing to go along with the delusion. We concoct a new reality, seeing what we
ant to see and hear what we want to hear.
Why is it that in the movies a young couple goes through 90
minutes of struggling with insurmountable odds only to fall in love and live
happily ever after? (Let’s get a Tee and a Hee out of that.) That’s where they
stop the movie, right at the happily ever after part. They hardly ever make a
sequel with the diapers, money problems and arguments. We don't want to see the
sequel.
This is all wishful thinking, yes? If there was a religion
that said you could pray yourself into happiness we’d go for it wouldn’t we? If
I had a religion that promised that all you would have to do is chant the same
words over and over again and you’d get the perfect partner or your current
partner would be transformed into someone more to your liking or you’d become
rich and beautiful, you might think about it. Too bad, that’s not Buddhism,
that’s wishful thinking. It is that kind of thinking that causes us to make the
facts of life fit into our view of what life should be like.
It’s sort of like going to the cemetery. People generally
hate going to a cemetery or a funeral. Why is that? It’s denial. They don’t want
to be reminded that they are going to die. “It’ll happen to my 97-year-old
grandmother but it’s never going to happen to me.” This is the where the ego
comes in. We are afraid of our impermanence and so avoid the death of others.
Besides, it doesn’t fit into our worldview of how things are supposed to be.
Life is supposed to be happy and we should live forever. That’s why we have the
heaven and hell mythology. But then, guess what we do, we argue over who is
going to heaven and who is going to hell. We want to avoid pain and suffering
but don’t mind letting others experience it.
In Buddhism we tell it like it is. Your partner is going to
get older, and probably smellier. You’re going to have arguments. You’re going
to get sick. You’re eventually going to die. You might even wind up in hell.
People will even disagree with you – a lot. There is nothing you can do about
it. Sometimes you’ll be right and sometimes you’ll be wrong. It’s not the end
if the world. That’s just the way it is. The point is that people don’t really
want to believe the truth.
We have to careful and we ought to tell the truth. Religion
should be the truth. Many religions feed into the wishful thinking and often
avoid the truth or sugar coat it. It is truth not wishful thinking that leads
to happiness and peace, the goal of Buddhism. Buddhism is about experience.
That’s hat religion should deal with, human experience, not just thinking, not
just reason but what it is that we are actually experiencing and thinking and
reasoning all coming together.
There is a lot of peace coming from the knowledge that, yes,
this is what marriage is like; this is what living is about; this is what my
life is all about. There is a lot of peace that comes from being realistic
about things. We are going to become old, we are going to be sick someday, and
we are going to leave this world someday. And it always happens much sooner
than we expect.
Would life be easier if we knew that on a certain date we
were going to get sick? Would life be convenient if we knew the date and time
of our death? The average man’s lifespan in America is about 72. Wow, I’m
getting pretty close. I’m a lot closer now than I was 50 years ago. I only have
a short time left. There are a few of you that are older than me. Think about that.
How do I want to spend that remaining time? Do I really want to argue and try
to impose my views on others? Do I really want other people subjected to my
anger and biases?
Coming to terms with how life really is makes you more
peaceful. It can make life more harmonious. It allows you to do the things that
are really important instead of wasting your life on silly, temporary,
unimportant things.
There’s a story of a young man who was a tremendously good
athlete. He was a boxer. People who knew him had aspirations for him to be a
champion someday. He had won almost every match he had ever been in since
college. Suddenly he started losing. When asked what the problem was he simply
told them that he realized that he didn’t have to win all the time. It was
incredibly stressful for him to be the best all the time. He already knew that
he would someday lose a fight and he didn’t want to live with that kind of
pressure. He was really much happier and freer being himself rather than what
people thought of as a champion. When he got rid of the pride of wanting to be
a champion and living up to other peoples’ expectations he became much more
peaceful and relaxed. He never became a champion but did become happy, with
himself and with life.
How much of our lack of freedom comes from these views we
have about ourselves and the way things are supposed to be? Who put these ideas
into our head? It’s conditioning.
All girls want to be beautiful and all boys want to
champions, heroes. I really feel for them. How much pressure is there on a girl
to be pretty and popular? The pressure on being the best or the prettiest or
the most liked is enormous. We do it to our kids all the time. It’s a condition
we place on them. Many kids believe their own families won’t love them if they
don’t adhere to this view of themselves. That is so unfair to them. It may or
may not be true, but that is how they feel. Many feel they must live up to the
expectations of other people, just as the boxer did.
Not all boys are capable of being champions. Only one boy
can be the best and even then, not all the time. Sometimes there will be
someone better.
Not all girls are pretty or popular. Look at all the stuff
they have to put on their face and the clothes they feel they must wear. This
past winter I saw young girls in their early teens walking around in shorts and
mini-skirts during one of our famous Chicago blizzards. Why would they do that?
It was the fashion. It was what was expected of them. I felt so sorry for these
girls with their blue legs.
When you actually know how the mind works it’s all very
simple. It’s conditioning that’s all. When conditioning works well it leads to
peace and happiness. When conditioning doesn’t work well then you might buy a
gun to protect yourself against the imaginary enemy next door. Or you might
believe you have to convert someone to your view so you can go to heaven. The
correct view of truth is a view that creates peace, harmony and freedom in the
world.
For those of you who go to religious places, never trust anyone
who wants to have more disciples and convert you to their view. The people that run those places must
be absolutely out of their minds. The more disciples you have the more late
night phone calls you get from people who are experiencing problems or who want
to commit suicide.
A religious leader ought to want to get rid of disciples. A
good teacher is one who wants to get rid of you. It’s like school, the object
of school is to graduate and get out. A good doctor is one who wants you to be
healed so he doesn’t have to treat you any more. A good psychologist, analyst
or therapist is one who wants to get rid of you by freeing you from your
delusions. A good Dharma teacher is one who wants to liberate you from your
wrong views so you’ll be at peace, happy and free. There is something wrong
with a teacher who wants to grab you and keep you. There is something wrong
with a view that entraps you and takes away your freedom.
I have seen many Dharma teachers who latch on to their
students for dozens of years. They tell you not read anything except from their
prescribed list. They tell you not to investigate other teachers or forms of
Buddhism because of this or that reason. There is something wrong with that.
Trust your instincts. You are being conditioned to lose your freedom, peace and
happiness.
One of the reasons why some Dhamma or Dharma centers are
successful is because no one is taking attendance. You don’t have to be there.
No one is going to question you. Your liberation is up to you not to me or any
one else. If you say you’re going to show up and then cancel two or three times
in a row, that’s okay. Your showing up doesn’t help me. It helps you. You won’t
be asked why you chose not to show up. Really, I won’t lay a tantric curse on
you.
The force to show up comes from you. The force for you to
believe what you want to believe also comes from you. The teacher helps in your
conditioning, but the teacher is not the only cause. Your own conditioning, the
condition you support or don’t support comes from you. You don’t have to buy
into every thought that comes into your head.
So far I have said that the criteria for a spiritual
teaching is that it must lead to peace, happiness and freedom. It should also
stand up to the scrutiny of clear vision. By clear vision I mean that the
teaching should take away your desires and fears, your wants and not
wants. This is not seeing only
what you want to see; not denying what you want to deny. This is an act of
courage and sometimes it means that you need encouragement to be truthful and
honest with yourself, to be at peace with yourself and who you are in this
life. This encouragement is nothing more than opening the door to the truth of
this moment. Allowing things to be what they are, allowing you to be who you
are, and allowing others just to be who they are without expectation.
This is a liberating and freeing truth. A love that attaches
and holds, that is constricting comes from a place of clouded vision, of not
seeing correctly. Can you really be in control of your life, the lives of
others; your death and the loss of others?
These things catch us unawares. They sneak up on us. Nobody
who is sane intends to get sick, intends to die, and intends their loved ones
to die. The intention is always elsewhere. Yet, here is the beauty of life, if
we accept the inevitability of these things it opens us up to the possibility
of freedom, of peace, of happiness. Whenever we are sick we can use it to help
us be more authentic and clear seeing human beings.
There is a saying, if you step into cow dung, take it home. Put it in your garden.
Whenever you savor the flavor of the fruit of your garden remember the cow dung
that made it possible. After all, what else can you expect a cow to do?